|
Community invasibility-
Positive relationships between local and regional diversity might mean that local assemblages are open to invasion and that local interactions exert weak influence
over species distributions. I tested these conclusions in Michigan ponds by introducing the regional species pool in large enclosures. The communities resisted
invasion by >90% of the species in the region. Invasibility declined with native species diversity, and the invaders were far more successful when the density of
native zooplankton was reduced, showing that species interactions excluded many potential invaders. These results contrast with the patterns, suggesting that
dispersal does not strongly limit zooplankton diversity and that biotic interactions play a major role.
J.B. Shurin. Dispersal limitation, invasion resistance, and the structure of pond zooplankton communities. Ecology 81: 3074-3086.
PDF
Theory of
local and regional diversity- To
resolve the contrast between the patterns and experiments, Emily Allen
and I modeled the effects of indirect facilitation via shared predators
on the relationship between local and regional diversity. The
model predicts that predators expand the conditions for linear, positive
patterns of local and regional richness among competitors. It also
predicts that predators can both promote regional diversity and depress local
diversity. These predictions were supported by an experiment that looked at the
effects of insect and fish predators on plankton communities that were either
connected to or isolated from the regional zooplankton species pool.
J.B. Shurin.
Interactive effects of predation and dispersal on zooplankton
communities. Ecology
82:3404-3416. PDF
J.B. Shurin
and E.G. Allen. Effects of competition, predation and dispersal
on local and regional species richness.
American Naturalist 158:624-637. PDF
Variable trophic
cascades among ecosystems- Trophic
cascades (indirect control of plant biomass by predators via herbivory) are often
thought to vary among ecosystems. Much heated debate has
concerned the question of whether top-down control is more important in aquatic
than terrestrial ecosystems. Along with Eric Seabloom, I have explored
theory that looks at the roles of body sizes of plants and consumers
and productivity of plants in the strength of trophic cascades.
Trophic cascades are strongest when herbivores are larger than plants, when
plants have high growth rates. Since these conditions are more
characteristic of aquatic plants than terrestrial, we have good reasons to expect
trophic cascades to be more important in water than on land.
To test these predictions, we performed a meta-analysis of 102 trophic cascade
experiments in six different ecosystems. The strongest cascades were in
marine and freshwater benthos, and the weakest in terrestrial ecosystems and
marine plankton. The results agree well with many of the predictions
from the theory.
J.B.
Shurin, E.T. Borer, E.W. Seabloom, K. Anderson, C.A. Blanchette, B.
Broitman, S.D. Cooper, and B. Halpern. A cross-ecosystem comparison of the
strength of trophic cascades. Ecology
Letters 5: 785-791.
PDF
The spread of exotic species- Exotic
species represent a major threat to ecosystem integrity. The
effectiveness of methods for controlling invasive species depends on whether their
ranges are limited primarily by dispersal or local factors. John
Havel and I are studying the expansion of Daphnia lumholtzi,
an invasive zooplankter, throughout the United States. We are
using data on physical factors, the biotic community and spatial position to
test spatial vs. local models of spread.
J.E. Havel,
J.B. Shurin and J. Jones. Estimating dispersal from patterns of
spread: spatial and local control of invasion by Daphnia lumholtzi in
Missouri lakes. Ecology 83: 3306-3318.
PDF
J.B. Shurin and J.E. Havel. 2002.
Hydrologic connections and overland dispersal in an exotic
freshwater crustacean. Biological Invasions 4:431-439.
PDF
I was also recently
involved in a debate in The
Scientist on the subject of ecology angst, along with other NCEAS post
docs. Here is a letter
we wrote in response to an earlier
letter Enjoy.
|