Data for 2001 and selected other years
2001 Data: Total bacteria counted and number of small squares they occupied (e.g 110 bact /7 squares).
| Time | Counts |
| 0 | 134/30; 118/26; 104/32; 122/32; 116/20 |
| 10 | 120/32; 130/20; 130/32; 124/31; 125/29; 128/26 |
| 25 | 119/32; 123/46; 127/43; 118/39; 134/42; 123/30 |
| 40 | 126/46; 121/50; 122/56; 122/40; 125/44; 118/45; 118/ 42 |
| 60 | 123/67; 119/52; 119/50; 110/46 |
| paramecium counts: 226, 205, 230 per 50 microliters. |
Note: I recommend that you ignore the first point in your calculations; start with 10 minutes.
2000 Data: Bacteria counts per small square
| Time | Data | Average |
| 0 | 15, 18, 20, 22, 23, 24, 26, 30 | 22.25 |
| 10 | 16, 13, 14, 17, 19, 14, 13, 16, 13, 17 | 15.38 |
| 20 | 14, 13, 13, 12, 14, 12, 13, 15, 13, 15 | 13.40 |
| 30 | 10, 8, 12, 9, 10, 9, 15, 9, 7, 11, 12, 13 | 10.42 |
| 40 | 12, 10, 9, 9, 8, 11, 11, 10, 10, 12, 9, 8, 10 | 9.92 |
| 0 | paramecium: 268, 278 per 50 ul |
1999 Data: Mean bacteria per small square
| Time | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Average |
| 0 | 13.7 | 14.2 | 9.6 | 12.8 | 12.58 |
| 10 | 10.7 | 9.7 | 7.6 | 9.4 | 9.35 |
| 20 | 7.8 | 5.4 | 4.0 | 8.3 | 6.38 |
| 30 | 6.9 | 4.2 | 2.7 | 6.9 | 5.18 |
| 40 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 4.9 | 3.73 | |
| Paramecium count: 300, 301 per 50 microliters | |||||
Note: These 1999 data are not as bad as they looked.
| Time | 1991 |
1996 |
1997 data | 1998 data - |
| count/sq | mean/ sq | mean/ sq. | n, mean, sd | |
| 0 min | 114/7 | 20 | 18.0 | 21, 20.00, 2.59 |
| 10 | 107/11 | 12.6 | 13.8 | 22, 13.14, 2.53 |
| 20 | 105/15 | 10.5 | 13.5 | 22, 8.64, 1.40 |
| 30 | 106/25 | 5.7 | 9.4 | 25, 7.88, 1.42 |
| 40 | 126/36 | 4.8 | 9.4 | 25, 7.12, 1.86 |
| Paramecium count/50ul: | 224, 215, 276 | 283, 270, 261 | 178, 187, 192 | 370, 342, 358 |
Analysis of data:
Osmoregulation data. I suggest that you plot both sets of data and compare the values obtained. In your analysis use the 1989 data.
| [Sucrose] mM | Contractile vacuole cycle duration (sec) | |
| 1989 | 2001 measurements at about 5 minutes after shift | |
| 0 mM | 7.5, 6.95, 8.04 | 10, 9, 10 |
| 5 mM | 8.68, 8.10, 9.26 | |
| 10 | 9.1, 8.21, 10.1 | 7, 8 |
| 15 | 10.2,9.1,11.3 | |
| 20 | 13.2,10.8,15.6 | 13, 13, 13, 10, 9, 8 |
| 30 | 18.5, 16.6, 20.7 | 8, 10, 9, 5, 15, 10 |
| 40 | 26.2,22.0, 30.5 | 11, 13, 10, 12, 10, 15 |
| 50 | 54.6, 41.5, 67.6 | 9, 10, 9, |
Calculate the rate of water expulsion for each experimental sample. Plot rate of water expulsion against external sucrose concentration. How can you estimate the iso-osmotic concentration of sucrose from the graph? What is the iso-osmotic concentration of sucrose. Assuming that sucrose is an ideal solute, calculate the osmotic pressure of the cytoplasm. Calculate the rate of water flow across the plasma membrane. What assumptions do you need to make? Discuss your estimate of membrane permeability with regard to the sample values supplied in your initial handout. How does the membrane permeability of paramecium compare with that for vertebrate cells? What do you make of the difference.
What do you make of the difference between the results for the two years? . Do you see any patterns?